Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Since Sandra was not aware of Jeff's criminal history,she will not be held liable for this incident.
B) Jeff was outside the scope of his employment,hence he is liable for this tort,and Sandra escapes liability.
C) Sandra is liable for the incident only under the vicarious liability doctrine.
D) Sandra is liable because of the direct liability doctrine.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) respondeat superior
B) direct liability
C) vicarious liability
D) implied warranty
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) may be liable even if the agent's acts were unauthorized.
B) may effectively limit his or her liability to those third parties if the agent has signed a disclaimer absolving the principal from liability.
C) will be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior only for the intentional acts of the agent.
D) will never be criminally liable unless he or she actively participated in the acts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) defensive conditions
B) exculpatory clauses
C) torts
D) ratification clauses
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,Juan did have actual authority to act.
B) Yes,Juan did have express authority to act.
C) Yes,Juan did have implied authority to act.
D) Yes,Juan did have apparent authority to act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contractual authority
B) Incidental authority
C) Apparent authority
D) Actual authority
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Bing will win the lawsuit because Dart's notice was inadequate to terminate Ritz's apparent authority.
B) Bing will win the lawsuit because Dart,the principal,is an insurer of Ritz's,the agent's acts.
C) Bing will lose the lawsuit,because Ritz lacked any express or implied authority to make the contract.
D) Bing will lose the lawsuit because Bing was negligent while making a contract with Ritz.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Express ratification
B) Unauthorized ratification
C) Implied ratification
D) Valid ratification
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Phillips is directly liable for negligent hiring.
B) Phillips is liable only under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
C) Phillips is not liable because Addis is an independent contractor.
D) Phillips is not liable because he could never have foreseen Addis' negligence.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) the principal's conduct justifies a reasonable assumption that he consents to the agent's act.
B) the principal manifests assent that his legal relations be affected.
C) the third party withdraws from the contract before the principal manifests assent.
D) the principal binds himself to an unauthorized or illegal act done by an agent.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) formalized
B) nonexistent
C) disclosed
D) undisclosed
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Corine is disallowed from ratifying Datz's contracts in order to transfer liability.
B) Datz has no liability once he discloses that Corine is the real principal.
C) The third party can hold only Datz liable since the third party believed that Datz was the principal.
D) The third party may choose to hold either Datz or Corine liable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Crater will be bound because of Borg's apparent authority.
B) Crater will not be bound because Borg exceeded his authority.
C) Crater will only be bound up to $2 million,the amount of Borg's authority.
D) Crater will be bound because of Borg's actual authority.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 71
Related Exams